ISLAM IN MOROCCO, DEMAGOGUERY OR SLAVERY?

Maroc politique – Religion / article de Mourad Degaulle alias Kaddour Errami (il se définit comme écrivain journaliste marocain réfugié politique en Algérie) / www.arabtimes.com

Le régime tortionnaire et totalitaire du Roi despote du Maroc l’utilise (l’Islam) souvent comme moyen de manipulation pour sacraliser son pouvoir politique.

ISLAM IN MOROCCO, DEMAGOGUERY OR SLAVERY?

                   Religion is what gives life, and what delights and is the refuge of souls burdened, the spirit of a world without spirit is the heart of a world without heart, it is the opium of the people. The regime torturer of totalitarian despot king of Morocco always use it as a means of manipulation for the sacralization of his political power. Religion can be used and transferred following the cases and problems to solve, either as a means of blackmail, libel, ethnocentrism, confusion, intimidation, mystification, obedience, prejudice, pressure conformism, propaganda, intellectual terrorism, against information or revenge.

                   There is a very strong relationship between the political discourse of the king and religious discourse.Not a relationship of neighbourhood, but a relationship of common heritage, in the sense and letter, the content and form.

                  Both speech, the king’s totalitarian political and religious, are opting to create a design language injunctive relief; religious discourse is not an objective to convince us, but we submit, and if you do not, you become disobedient (pagan); in the same way political discourse draws from the totalitarian authority based on the silence and stigma, and not dialogue. Both authoritarian discourse are based on socio-political structures (subjective human conceptions) of the same design, i.e. they go up and down and not allow any movement in the opposite direction, except that politics is human who falls in the interest of a minority in power, and religion is divine, and returned in the interest of society as a whole.

                  In deed, the King and all heads of state Arab-Islamic-which monopolizes the authority mainly for the physical exercise of repression and he will judge and punish, which prohibits the assassination and imposes order, order him more important than the people. This is not this duality that set a certain alliance between politics and the sacred?

                Just as the sacred exerts a crackdown on imagination and guaranteed obeying any order, the policy is the sacred aspect to the point that any attack on the authority of the king passes for a form of unbelief through of political repression, economic, intellectual and Gnostic or agnostic. And you can decide with certainty that there is no regime believer or unbeliever, but the stubbornness of certain regimes, such as the despot of Morocco, seen as a religious regime, which does not mean that it is based and manipulate religion that is organizational strength of the company (in its interest) i.e. he uses religion to take advantage of its criminal force and hegemony of its representatives in society.

                  So, the king serves people of religion the same way he handles intellectuals, democrats, secular journalists, writers, police and army to perpetuate the established order, control freedoms and contain the political opposition. The unholy is not someone who despises the gods of others, but the wicked is the one that God gives to the opinions of others.

                 In defending religion, the king wants to prove its credibility, and he needs the approval because he doubted his own credibility or what he is sure that his credibility is questionable or questioned.

                 The king has no intellectual potential of its trusted companions and its officials, but he is more interested in people who have an influence on society and the Plebs ignorant; why he prefers to hire known names, which have a good reputation and religious who could submit or at least not opposed to its radical despotism, in order to boast assets aligned. For that the king prefers engage men of religion (that is the case of the Moroccan Islamic party PJD) among its arsenal and propaganda apparatus and repressive policy, i.e. that he prefers the political role must be assumed by men of religion. Thus, the relationship between the king and men of religion becomes a rewarding relationship and exchanges of mutual interests. And those who refuse this game are martyred (that is the case of detained Islamists: Kettani, Rafiki, Fizazi…)

                    Throughout history there are instances where religion is man himself despot or adviser to the despot, which is the case of the courts of inquisition. But to say that a political party is religious opposition party, it never existed throughout history, and it becomes a comedy rather comical.

                   The Heads of Arab States want through the men of religion, suggest the depth of their popular authorities by the blessing of the religion of their powers. By the way, in Islamic societies, throughout history, there was always a very strong link that connects the power to religion, the imam at the Caliph. And if the latter two are distinct, it must first ascertain the allegiance of the second, and the second is to ensure that we make the speech on Friday and decide on sermons in mosques on his behalf.

                  From there appears the need men of religion who are aware of their utility to a point where they sometimes carry the political blackmail against the political power that wants to give a false image of secularism and openness to foreigners, and same time shows for the Plebs as protector of religion, celebrating in front of the cameras religious festivities, transmitting them by the mass media, and forcing the ceremony all his ministers and trusted companions, even the wicked. In part against the king does not ask great things to men of religion, except the speech on Friday that emanates from the authorities, signing petitions and a few acts of faith, sermons and a few random utility.

                       There is no fatal destiny to change the human being torturers and victims, but it is the totalitarian Arab regimes who want to keep us at this stage and instinctive primate. And when these human beings want out of this phase, the king obliges them to stay or reduced to a level lower than animals by repression and by tools, including religion, even lower. Then he proves his status superior to the violence of these animal human beings who have not passed the stage animal. And as human being is the creature of God’s most noble, then the repression of King adopts a religious design.

                        The king of Morocco-as well as heads of Arab States to maintain its hegemony and its dictatorship on the Moroccan people, he needs two social functions: the torturer (policeman, policeman, soldier…) and religious (Imam preacher, religious political party.)

                        There is no difference between the priest, the sorcerer and political demagogue because there is no difference between religion, witchcraft and ideology, which have a single objective: the manipulation of others, reorientation and control of his actions.

                        And it is necessary to use drugs victims of injustice of the king, who could not get out of this injustice, to compensate them psychologically to accept their lifestyle. And that compensation is what the wait after death: the afterlife. The religion teaches them that, and they are committed to this idea because it is their sole conciliator and balm. Also they must not feel they are victims, they must be convinced that this is the will of god.

                      The religion of the king we do believe that the creative genius is not because the world was created in six days, and nothing more will be created or invented. In short we become a society of contemplation, sleep and obedience.

                      Once again it proves that the policy ideology mythological and spirit are the same piece of Janus. And thereafter the policy becomes determining the conduct of others and their control.

    By Mourad DEGAULLE aka ERRAMI KADDOUR Writer freelancer journalist Moroccan asylum seeker in Algeria e-mail: degaullema@yahoo.fr site web: www.mouradegaulle.unblog.fr

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *